Latest Insights
VAM Multi-Asset Funds Market Outlook – April 2026
In Dire Straits: Discipline in Volatile Markets
Markets in March were dominated by one key issue, the current conflict involving the US, Israel and Iran.
With headlines and expectations changing daily, it’s easy for investors to become disoriented and lose their way. At the time of writing, global stock markets are now rallying on hopes that the conflict will come to an end sooner rather than later. However, near term risks remain high with events continuing to unfold at a rapid pace, and announcements and news from the US and Iran developing by the hour.

While headlines and news flow can be alarming, the important thing for investors is to understand how the conflict ultimately will affect the “real economy”. The key question then comes down to whether the situation does indeed resolve in the near future or evolves into a more prolonged disruption, with lasting economic consequences for the global economy.
As the investment team at atomos has noted in its prior updates last month, markets have been particularly sensitive to developments affecting global energy supply, given the importance of the Strait of Hormuz – a vital shipping route through which around 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas flows. This sensitivity has driven sharp movements across global stock and bond markets over the month.
In this month’s piece, the team discusses how markets have reacted to this geopolitical shock, how it thinks about events that might unfold, what it considers important amidst the daily noise, and how this all impacts portfolios and its approach to investment.
How markets have responded
Market reactions have been most pronounced following headlines that change perceptions around how long energy supplies might be disrupted, and whether regional infrastructure could be damaged in ways that slow the recovery of global energy supply.
Overall, oil prices have risen sharply over March, alongside increases in natural gas and related petrochemical products. While energy prices have jumped most significantly for buyers seeking to secure supply over the next few months, prices for purchases 1-2 years into the future have risen by much less, suggesting markets continue to expect eventual normalisation rather than lasting scarcity.
Consequently, stock markets have fallen over the month, though declines have so far been relatively orderly, in the investment team’s view. European and Asian markets, which are more dependent on Middle Eastern energy imports, have underperformed the US in March, although these markets had also seen much stronger gains earlier in the year. Global stock markets fell about 5% in pound sterling over the month. On the back of a very strong start to the year, this leaves global stock market investors with relatively modest losses year-to-date.

Interest rates and inflation expectations
Government bond markets have been particularly volatile, as investors reassess the outlook for inflation and interest rates.
Rising energy prices have led markets to quickly change their outlook on what they expect central banks like the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England to do this year. Markets had expected a series of short-term interest rate cuts back in February, but quickly reversed course as the war kicked off, removing these expectations, or even reversing them.
These shifts reflect concerns that a prolonged energy shock could push inflation higher and force central banks to respond more aggressively, particularly in regions that are more energy‑dependent.
The results of this change in outlook on bond markets was swift. Government bond prices fell and bond yields (which move inversely to prices) across major developed markets rose sharply on expectations of higher central bank policy rates. In the UK, yields have risen more sharply, with market moves appearing especially pronounced, relative to underlying economic fundamentals, in our view.
Thinking in scenarios
In periods of high uncertainty, scenario analysis is a useful way to think about possible outcomes. For the current Middle East conflict, the investment team at atomos considers three broad scenarios, ranging from a short‑lived disruption to a more severe escalation.
The team’s central expectation remains that disruption to energy supplies is relatively temporary, allowing markets and economies to stabilise later in the year and over 2027. Policymakers are actively working to limit the impact of the energy supply disruption by releasing strategic reserves, temporarily easing sanctions or embargoes, and encouraging energy conservation. If the conflict does indeed come to an end in the weeks to come (as President Trump has recently indicated) and shipping in the Strait begins to normalise, this outcome would be likely.
A more adverse outcome would likely require a major escalation of the conflict, such as further direct attacks on regional energy infrastructure or the involvement of additional global powers, the economic impact of which would vary by region. The investment team thinks this scenario is less likely that the one outlined above – but cannot be ruled out.
In that environment, the ultimate market outcomes would heavily depend on the countries’ starting economic positions, their ability to absorb shocks, and how exposed they are to Middle Eastern energy supply. For example, even in a more disruptive scenario, the US economy would likely remain relatively resilient, supported by strong underlying growth drivers such as investment in AI, fiscal support, and healthy household and corporate balance sheets. Parts of Europe, Asia and select Emerging Market economies would all be more vulnerable to a prolonged energy shock, likely impacting stock and bond markets significantly.
What this means for long‑term investors
History suggests that geopolitical market shocks which remain geographically contained often lead to short‑term volatility, but have limited lasting impact on long‑term investment returns. More persistent damage to investor portfolios has typically occurred only when conflicts result in prolonged energy supply shortages that materially weaken economic growth.
The 1973 Arab oil embargo is one such example, where oil prices quadrupled and sustained shortages fed into persistent inflation, slower growth and policy tightening across advanced economies, prompting a structural reassessment of energy security and dependence on Middle Eastern supply.
In contrast, short-term oil prices rose roughly 50% to 60%* over the past month, but with future price expectations showing far more modest increase, around 15% to 20%.
While certainly material, these increases are coming from a low base, and the economy is now far less sensitive to fossil fuel prices than it was in the 1970s. At this stage, recent developments do not materially alter the investment team’s medium‑term investment outlook into late 2026 and 2027.

*Oil and energy prices vary by location and time, with Brent and WTI being the most commonly used benchmarks. Here the team references changes to short-dated Brent pricing as well as Brent oil futures.
Staying disciplined
Geopolitical developments remained in focus during the month and into March, particularly in the Middle East and around global trade policy.
Periods of heightened uncertainty can be unsettling, but they also reinforce the importance of sticking to well‑established investment principles.
Rather than reacting to the changing news flow and the challenge of short-term market timing, which risks crystalising unnecessary losses, the investment team at atomos believes portfolio decisions should remain guided by long‑term objectives, and a clear framework for assessing how events may, or may not, change the underlying economic and market outlook.
Although we can speculate, nobody can be certain about what the next headline will bring, what the US administration or the Iranian regime will do or say. And every crisis has its own dynamics and risks. Further challenges to the global economy resulting from higher energy prices for longer than expected cannot, of course, be ruled out.
However, we can take some comfort in history suggesting that most geopolitical crises have short-term negative impacts on markets and stock prices, which set the stage for more positive returns over the following six to twelve months.
atomos’ investment philosophy emphasises portfolio diversification as the cornerstone of a disciplined approach and staying the course to build wealth through investment over the long term. The investment team believes maintaining a diversified, long‑term approach to investing remains the most effective way to navigate periods of geopolitical uncertainty.
Sign Up for our Newsletter
IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ
Source: atomos.
Information correct as of 1st April 2026.
FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ONLY.
atomos is the trading name of both Atomos Investments Limited (FCA No: 122588, Company No: 2041819) and Atomos Financial Planning Limited (FCA No: 193503, Company No: 3879955), both authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and registered in England and Wales. Registered offices: 2nd floor, 5 Hatfields (alto), London, SE1 9PG.
The information and opinion contained in this article should not be treated as a forecast, research or advice to buy or sell any particular investment or to adopt any investment strategy. Any views expressed are based on information received from a variety of sources which we believe to be reliable, but are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness by atomos. Any expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Investing involves risk and the value of investments, and the income from them, may fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the original amount invested.
The companies mentioned are shown for illustrative purposes only, do not constitute investment advice, and are not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Read Important Information for Singapore Investors.
Disclaimer.
This is a marketing communication. This document is intended for use by professional financial advisers only. The distribution of VAM Funds and the offering of the shares may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Private investors should contact their financial adviser for more details on any of the products featured. It is the responsibility of any person in possession of this document to inform themselves of, and to observe, all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdictions. Prospective applicants for shares should inform themselves as to the legal requirements and consequences of applying for, holding and disposing of shares and any applicable exchange control regulations and taxes in the countries of their respective citizenship, residence or domicile. Read Full Disclaimer
